|
|
3.5 Evaluation3.5.1
Project design takes account of international and regional experience,
particularly through the appointment of consultants (Atkins) for the feasibility
study who have substantial experience both of airport design and procurement
alternatives. In addition, as
authors of the Overseas Territories Institutional Development Study (OTIDS),
which led to the establishment of ASSI, Atkins have a thorough understanding of
aviation requirements and regulation in the OTs. The
feasibility study incorporated a review of all earlier work on development of
air access to 3.5.2
Atkins’ economic model, developed for the feasibility study,
incorporated advice from eminent economist, Professor Pissarides of the London
School of Economics. Their capital
costs estimates and economic assumptions for the ‘long runway’ have been
reviewed by an independent economist and quantity surveyors E C Harris.
All endorse the robust nature of the analysis. 3.5.3
Lessons learned from aerodrome
design in other OTs were applied. In
particular, a very close check was made with ASSI to determine allowable
operational parameters. 3.5.4 Project design has been reviewed by the Office of Government Commerce (OGC) through the Gateway process, which is specifically designed to ensure the adoption of best practice in government procurement. Further Gateway reviews are planned at key stages in project implementation. 3.5.5 The project is designed to address a unique problem, and it is unlikely that there will be significant lessons for other DFID programmes. The possible need for ex-post evaluation will be addressed during the Mid-Term Review. |
Copyright © 2005 ST HELENA NEWS MEDIA SERVICES |